2 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > long island sound
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
2 Results
filtered by
Tags > long island sound
Clear All
External Link
305b Assessed 2008 River, Lake, Estuary Set:
Connecticut 305b Assessed River 2008 is a 1:24,000-scale, line feature-based layer that includes rivers that have been assessed to comply with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2008. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only rivers that were assessed in the time period above referenced. It can be used with the 2008 Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are lines that represent the locations of assessed rivers. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of a unique identifier (segment ID) for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please refer to the following report:
"2008 State of Connecticut Integrated Water Quality Report" at http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/water/water_quality_management/305b/2008_final_ct_integratedwqr.pdf Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake 2008 is a 1:24,000-scale, polygon feature-based layer that includes lakes that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2008. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only assessed lakes. It can be used with the 2006 Connecticut 305b Assessed River layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are polygon locations that represent the locations of assessed lakes. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of the Connecticut lake identification number, a unique identifier for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
Connecticut 305b Assessed River 2008 is a 1:24,000-scale, line feature-based layer that includes rivers that have been assessed to comply with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2008. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only rivers that were assessed in the time period above referenced. It can be used with the 2008 Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are lines that represent the locations of assessed rivers. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of a unique identifier (segment ID) for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please refer to the following report:
"2008 State of Connecticut Integrated Water Quality Report" at http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/water/water_quality_management/305b/2008_final_ct_integratedwqr.pdf Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake 2008 is a 1:24,000-scale, polygon feature-based layer that includes lakes that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2008. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only assessed lakes. It can be used with the 2006 Connecticut 305b Assessed River layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are polygon locations that represent the locations of assessed lakes. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of the Connecticut lake identification number, a unique identifier for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
Updated
January 8 2021
Views
1
External Link
305b Assessed 2010 River, Lake, Estuary Set:
Connecticut 305b Assessed River 2010 is a 1:24,000-scale, line feature-based layer that includes rivers that have been assessed to comply with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2010. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only rivers that were assessed in the time period above referenced. It can be used with the 2010 Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are lines that represent the locations of assessed rivers. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of a unique identifier (segment ID) for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please refer to the following report:
"State of Connecticut Integrated Water Quality Report" at http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/water/water_quality_management/305b/ctiwqr10final.pdf Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake 2010 is a 1:24,000-scale, polygon feature-based layer that includes lakes that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2010. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only assessed lakes. It can be used with the 2010 Connecticut 305b Assessed River layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are polygon locations that represent the locations of assessed lakes. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of the Connecticut lake identification number, a unique identifier for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please re
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2010. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only rivers that were assessed in the time period above referenced. It can be used with the 2010 Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are lines that represent the locations of assessed rivers. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of a unique identifier (segment ID) for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please refer to the following report:
"State of Connecticut Integrated Water Quality Report" at http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/water/water_quality_management/305b/ctiwqr10final.pdf Connecticut 305b Assessed Lake 2010 is a 1:24,000-scale, polygon feature-based layer that includes lakes that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.
This layer is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2010. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. This layer includes only assessed lakes. It can be used with the 2010 Connecticut 305b Assessed River layer and the Connecticut 305b Assessed Estuary layer to geographically display attainment and non-attainment for each designated use on assessed waters within Connecticut's boundaries.
Features are polygon locations that represent the locations of assessed lakes. The sources for these features include the hydrography layer and the water quality classification layer. Attribute information is comprised of the Connecticut lake identification number, a unique identifier for each feature, the name of the waterbody, its location, the assessment cycle (year), the water type, the water quality class goal, the length of the feature in miles, the National Hydrography Dataset basin number, and the assessment for the following categories: aquatic life, recreation, fish consumption, and drinking water supply. Data is compiled at 1:24,000 scale. This dataset is not updated.
For more information, please re
Updated
January 8 2021
Views
0
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results
Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset.
SuggestCategories
A-Z
- 311
- Alabama
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Baltimore County
- Birmingham, AL
- Bloomington, Indiana
- Boundaries and GIS
- Buffalo NY
- COVID-19
- Cannabis Control Commission
- Capital Projects
- Chattanooga
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- City Services
- City of Boston, MA
- Code Violations
- Collisions
- Connecticut
- Conservation Ontario
- County Planning
- Crime
- Crime Stats
- Dallas
- Delaware
- Delaware - DSP
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Corrections
- Department of Health
- Dept. of Transportation
- Development
- Domain Names
- ESSA
- Economic Development
- Economy
- Education
- ExIm Bank
- Fairfax County
- Finance
- Finance And Accountability
- Fire
- Florida
- Florida Clerks
- Freshwater
- GIS
- Gainesville
- Georgia
- Georgia health Inspections
- Global Health
- Glynn County
- Government
- Grand Rapids
- Grants - USA Spending
- Hillsborough County
- Housing
- Human Resources
- ICANN
- IMF Trade Team
- IP Addresses
- Juvenile Courts
- KYTC Maps
- Kentucky
- Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
- Land Use
- Lawton, OK
- Management and Efficiency
- Manatee County
- Marine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- NAIC
- NNPS Performance
- NOAA
- National League of Cities
- Nature Conservancy
- New York City
- New York City Parks
- New York State
- New jersey
- Newport News Public Schools
- Norfolk, VA
- North Dakota DOT
- OJP
- Opioids
- Orange County
- PEPFAR
- Parking
- Pennsylvania
- Permits
- Permitting
- Pinellas County
- Police
- Public Finance
- Public Health
- Puerto Rico
- Ramsey County
- Rhode Island Treasurer
- Road Safety
- Schools Data
- Shelby County
- State Of Iowa
- Terrestrial
- Traffic Collisions
- Travel Funding
- USAC
- USAID
- Urban Blight
- Vermont
- Veterans Affairs
Tags
A-Z
- 1997 (1)
- 2011 (1)
- 305b (5)
- 311 (1)
- alabama (1)
- algebra (1)
- ap enrollment (1)
- assault (1)
- assessments (1)
- blight (4)
- bloomington indiana (1)
- boundaries (9)
- budget (2)
- building complaint (1)
- buildings (1)
- campaign contribution (1)
- capital projects (1)
- cases (1)
- cdo (1)
- census (3)
- cis data (1)
- cities (1)
- city council (2)
- city services (1)
- coastal area (2)
- coastal boundary (2)
- coastal regulations (2)
- code enforcement (2)
- college scorecard (2)
- collisions (3)
- collisions demo (1)
- complaints data (1)
- comptroller (2)
- concatenated datasets (1)
- congressional districts (1)
- connecticut (1)
- connecticut coastal management act (2)
- conservation (1)
- construction (2)
- council districts (2)
- counties (4)
- county commission (1)
- covid forecast (2)
- covid risk (2)
- crashes (1)
- crime (1)
- csa (1)
- ct (6)
- ctdeep (7)
- data (7)
- deep (7)
- degrees (1)
- development (1)
- districts (4)
- drugs (1)
- earnings (2)
- economy (4)
- education (4)
- education earnings (1)
- efficiency (1)
- enrollment (1)
- environment (2)
- environmental (5)
- estuary (5)
- exim (2)
- expenses (1)
- finance (2)
- food (1)
- food inspections (1)
- forest (1)
- geo (1)
- geoscientificinformation (3)
- gis (19)
- graduate earnings (1)
- grants (1)
- health (1)
- health violations (1)
- healthcare (1)
- higher education (1)
- hillsborough county (1)
- hiring (1)
- hr (2)
- incident level data (1)
- inlandwaters (3)
- insect resistance (1)
- jefferson county (1)
- jobs (1)
- join (2)
- joined mali (1)
- joins (1)
- kentucky (1)
- lake (5)
- land conservation and outdoor recreation (2)
- long island sound
- mali (7)
- maps (1)
- mcps (2)
- medicare (2)
- miami-dade (2)
- municipal (1)
- municipal property (1)
- naloxone (2)
- narcan (1)
- national (1)
- nces (1)
- neighborhoods (5)
- nga (2)
- oceans (3)
- offenders (1)
- open (7)
- open data (7)
- open space (2)
- opioid (1)
- opioids (1)
- overdose (1)
- parcel value (1)
- parks (1)
- payroll (1)
- pennsylvania counties (1)
- performance (1)
- permanently protected open space (1)
- permits (1)
- pinellas courts (1)
- planningcadastre (2)
- police (1)
- politics (1)
- population (1)
- ports mgmt (1)
- precincts (1)
- precipitation (1)
- preserved land (1)
- private (1)
- procurement (1)
- projects (1)
- property (1)
- protected (1)
- public safety (2)
- real estate (2)
- recreation (1)
- representatives (1)
- resources (1)
- restaurants (3)
- river (5)
- roads (2)
- safety (1)
- sales (1)
- sandy springs (1)
- school districts (2)
- school earnings (1)
- schools (1)
- seattle (1)
- set (5)
- space (2)
- spatial (1)
- sub award (1)
- surveys (1)
- taxes (2)
- teacher ratio (1)
- teachers (1)
- temperature (1)
- texas (2)
- towns (1)
- tracts (1)
- trade (1)
- traffic (1)
- travel (1)
- union query (1)
- us states (1)
- violations (1)
- virginia senate (1)
- voting (1)
- wards (1)
- watersheds (1)
- wildlife area (1)
- zip codes (9)
- zoning (1)